Spring means meetings: BIO2004 (in San
Francisco) and the NanoBusiness Alliance annual meeting (in New York), among
many others (including The Business of Nano in Philadelphia). It’s the time of
year when each industry takes a global view of the latest developments,
articulates the pressing issues, sets new trends, and does a self-assessment.
The global focus this year at BIO was obesity (and the
often-accompanying diabetes) and how genetically modified foods are being
developed to address this problem, which is
reaching epidemic proportions in the United States.
One of the most exciting developments at BIO2004 is
that New York State is finally starting to buzz. “For the last few years the
‘bio buzz’ has been on other states,” says
Louis Garguilo, Jr., Director of Industry Development for Empire State
Development (ESD), New York State’s economic development agency. “New York
State has been quietly going along, doing and growing our business. Well, the
buzz is back on New York. And we aim to increase it.”
They’ve
been doing just that, starting with a classy pavilion at BIO2004. Garguilo and
his agency work one-on-one with New
York–based companies that are expanding, to keep them in New York. He
also works with out-of-state companies looking to relocate. ESD helps these
companies find facilities and skilled workers and creates incentives to attract
and keep biotech companies. “This year in San Francisco, when I was asked what
is happening in the industry in New York State, and I started to talk about
examples from Pfizer’s $1 billion and 2,000 new jobs in Manhattan to Henry
Schein’s 800 new jobs on Long Island to Boston Scientific’s growing presence in
Glens
Falls….the interested party usually ran out of time before I ran out of things
to talk about.”
Another example of his success is
Acceptys, a company that grew out of the
Audubon incubator in the spring and announced
they were staying in New York. The headquarters remain in Manhattan and
the R&D is located at SUNY
Albany.
“This is the perfect win-win-win scenario,” says Garguilo. So is Eyetech, which
expanded and expects to create about 100 jobs over the next three years. Wooed
by other states, they chose New York when ESD helped them find a facility and
offered a capital grant. Their R&D and other contacts were already in New
York City institutions, and they didn’t want to leave or lose them. This
arrangement lets Eyetech keep the foundations they’ve worked hard to create
while enabling them to grow.
Two upstate deals are noteworthy. Vaccinex just
completed a successful VC round and moved from Rochester’s Strong Memorial
Hospital to a larger facility in Rochester, where they will grow to 90
employees. And Bristol-Myers Squibb has established its Center for Biologics
Development in Syracuse, adding new jobs.
Everyone expects summer to be slow. Not so for Garguilo this year. He
is currently working on several deals at the same time. And he doesn’t expect
this momentum to stop anytime soon. If you have a biotech firm anywhere in New York State, and you want to expand and stay
in-state, or are out-of-state and looking to
relocate, contact Louis(
lgarguilo@empire.state.ny.us).He’s making things happen at an
unprecedented pace.
Two interesting marketing stories piqued our interest at BIO2004: The
first is a follow-up to the cocktail party hosted by Kirkpatrick &
Lockhart, LLP at
BIO2003 in Washington, DC (see the “Creating Buzz” column in the 3rd quarter issue, 2003). Everything
about that party had been done right: It was hosted at Ortinque, a classy
Caribbean restaurant; the party was manageable in size and volume; and the
“culture” of the party
reflected
the culture of the firm—warm and welcoming, as opposed to the mass of chaos at
the hospitality suites across the street.
Well, this year BIO wisely discontinued the
hospitality suites and gave everyone a night off. Individual companies sponsored their own parties (by invitation
only). The K&L party was at a significantly different venue—
Jillian’s (a sports bar) near the Moscone Convention Center—but featured
the same warm and welcoming
attitude we remembered from last year. Once again, despite having other
parties to go to, we stayed a long time at
K&L’s
because the company fostered networking with their
attorneys as well as with other attendees. Isn’t that the point, after
all, of this kind of marketing?
To learn more about their marketing, we spoke to
Eileen Smith Ewing, a partner in the Boston office of K&L and the Team
Leader in the Life Science Group. Ewing heads up the marketing efforts of the
entire practice group. K&L has a special BIO steering committee (composed
of a partner from each of the company’s 10 offices and one marketing liaison to
make everything seamless), which starts
planning a year in advance for thenext
BIO. The partners in the K&L practice in BIO’s host city have the
most influence over the look and feel of the event. The San Francisco practice
is brand new, with a handful of attorneys who had just joined the firm. “They plunged in and hit the ground running,” says
Ewing. You wouldn’t know this from the reception at Jillian’s.
Measuring marketing is difficult in events such as
these. But we asked Ewing: What is K&L’s definition of ROI? There are a
couple of returns on the marketing investment,” Ewing responds. “One very
important return is that in a practice group like life sciences any one of us
in a given office has clients in far-flung geographical locations around the
country, and the BIO meeting is a rare chance to see them and welcome them and
renew the ties. Part of what our clients expect from us (because it’s a food
chain from academic institutions, to small compa‑
nies,
VCs, to the big pharma companies) is introductions among these groups. We worked with clients all along the food
chain so we see the big picture and use this event to get people to meet and
mingle.”
Another return on investment is cross selling. Ewing
says, “The life sciences group is an interdisciplinary group with lawyers
practicing everything from corporate deals to product liability litigation,
intellectual property, and regulatory practice (FDA-related). It’s a great
opportunity for us to invite our current clients and introduce them to other lawyers who do a very different type
of life sciences’ practice work. In addition to cross selling, the BIO
event is an opportunity to increase visibility by showing our biotech clients that we can introduce them to other
clients and expand their own business opportunities….And it’s nice to have a
K&L family reunion once a year.” For these reasons, “It’s crucial that the
mood of the event should be accessible and friendly.”
The least reliable part of the
ROI is to have brand new client opportunities walk into the reception. It’s “less a caseof that than
reinforcing existing relationships,” says Ewing.
The San Francisco and Washington venues were very
different. How did the prices vary? “The price was the same and they stuck to
an almost identical budget for both
venues—we’re a fiscally conservative firm and we don’t throw money at
marketing,” says Ewing.
The second marketing story we took away from BIO is
about a small company called Monal Labs and their booth. Jeff Wright, who works
at Monal, designed the booth’s look, feel,
and theme. “I have to decide how to be unique.” Wright’s biggest
challenge, like that of anyone who has a booth at a trade show as large as BIO,
is to
find a way to “get people to make a mental assent that
Monal is a full-service construction firm, rather than just having them look
and smile as they grab my free give-away (much the way I do when I walk the
shows).”
His solution? Put a massage chair in the booth. It
worked! The chair was programmed for a two-minute massage. A headphone provided
accompanying audio, which began, “Monal Labs, for all your biotech and specialty construction needs, invites you to relax
for the next two minutes.” Two minutes of sales pitch? No; instead,
Wright programmed soft, relaxing music to listen to— music he composed for the
occasion. To complete the
experience, the chair faced a
plasma-screen slide show of
LabToWallStreet
different
aspects of high-tech facilities Monal has completed. The slide show lasted just under two minutes. The entire experience was a well-orchestrated
environment. “It changed roles for us. Normally when walking through a trade show,
you try not to make contact with the guy working the booth because he will try
to ‘sell’ you some-thing.” In this case, people wanted to be at the Monal booth because
“they ‘heard’ about ‘the chair.’ ” Several times
there was a line at the booth, waiting for a free massage, “or as I like to think of it, a free commercial for Monal,” says
Wright.
ROI? “Time will tell if we got any good leads. But the idea of a trade show is to get as many people educated
to the services or product you offer. This was a smashing success.”
Disturbing trends in science
articulated at two nano meetings
Interesting trends, or expressions
of distress, surfaced during the
NanoBusiness Alliance’s annual meeting and
The Business of Nano meeting.The latter encompassed “more than 500 key
corporate and academic nanotech associates representing funding, research,
development, manufacturing and investment communities. . .assembledat the state’s second major nano gathering
sponsored bythe Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania,” according to Laura Felty,
Deputy Press Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Community and
Economic Development. (The meeting is an
example that New York State could benefit from following.)
The first issue is women’s rights. At the NanoBusiness Alliance meeting, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon
spoke about the “systemic discrimination” against women in science and
advocated that Title IX be applied to womenin
academia. Senator’s Wyden’s view was refreshing andexciting. All one had to do was look around the room tosee the gender disparity. Senator Wyden
encouraged theaudience to contact him
to continue the discussion on this issue but
unfortunately apparently didn’t tell his press secretary: I made three
unsuccessful attempts to reach him.
The second issue is education. At The Business of Nano meeting, two facets of this issue were brought up
that reflect important issues in science, regardless of geographical
location or type of scientific pursuit. The first isbrain drain. In Pennsylvania (and the East Coast in general, we’ve been told), students receive
science degrees andleave the state
for greener pastures (usually in the south),
creating
a gaping hole in the state for the qualified scientists it needs. So, on the one hand, Pennsylvania, a leader in nano and bio technology, attracts companies and
research to the state. On the other hand, it’s losing the necessary
resources—homegrown scientists—to sustain those efforts. Pennsylvania, again in
the forefront of
addressing and remedying the situation, has
established astrategic program to counteract brain drain. It’s called theKeystone Innovation Zone Program—an
“economic stimulus package specifically designed to retain and attract the young and talented graduates coming out of
universities
that conduct research,” says
Felty.
And another kind of brain drain
was brought up by an educator in the
audience. There are few qualified scienceteachers
at the grade-school level to bring children along in science and instill a love of science in them. Without this
foundation, it’s difficult for kids to further their studies in pursuit of a career. No wonder the
importation of scientists from abroad is a trend. These issues have too long
remained dormant and unarticulated on a large scale. Pennsylvania is ahead of the pack in addressing them.
The revitalization of….Brooklyn?
Yup.
A unique entity grows in
Brooklyn—a new incubator located on the
SUNY Downstate campus. The ribbon-cutting
ceremony took place on June 24 when the AdvancedBiotechnology Incubator opened its first phase in a multi-phase project: an 11,000-square-foot building. The
biotech incubator, part of a larger
Advanced BiotechnologyPark,
includes laboratories and office spaces. Downstate’s faculty researchers, the medical/scientific library, and other
specialized facilities are steps away, making it the perfect location for a
biomedical incubator.
An anchor tenant, ImClone Systems,
Inc., has constructed a 13,000-square-foot facility adjacent to the incubator for a new division that is developing
innovative new treatments for cancer and
rheumatoid arthritis.
The incubator is part of
Downstate’s Brooklyn Biotechnology Consortium, established in cooperation with local institutions, elected officials, and
communityleaders. As biotech
businesses grow, they will be able to secure
manufacturing space in the Borough in the Brooklyn Army Terminal.